Railroad Lawsuit Kidney Cancer
Rail workers are exposed to carcinogens. Exposure to harmful substances such as gasoline, diesel fuel, benzene and creosote has been linked to cancers as well as chronic conditions such as mesothelioma, lung cancer as well as bladder cancer.
Contact a lawyer for railroad cancer today to schedule a complimentary initial consultation in the event that you or someone close to you has developed a serious illness that is related to your employment with railroad.
Exposure to Carcinogens
Railroad workers are exposed a variety of dangerous carcinogens on a daily basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Many railroad cancer lawsuit s have been filed against various railroad companies. These lawsuits were filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act, that was passed in 1908.
People who suffer from cancer because of exposure to toxins could be qualified for compensation. A lawyer from the railroad industry will review the claim of a victim and determine whether an FELA lawsuit is possible against the company responsible for the illness.
A railroad worker could be entitled to compensation to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages resulting from their illness. A lawyer can help clients file a lawsuit within the three-year statute of limitations set by FELA.
Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he developed leukemia as a result of his work on trains exposed to chemicals like creosote and degreasing solvents. He worked on tanks brake shoes, cabooses and tank cars. He claims he stood on railroad ties that smelled of creosote and saw placards on train cars with skulls and crossbones, warning that the contents contained toxic substances. He also claims to have been exposed to diesel fumes when working on locomotive engines as well as when he stopped in tunnels. The toxins made breathing difficult and caused headaches.
Bladder cancer lawsuit to provide a safe Work Environment
Despite the fact that work in railroads has always presented a significant risk, modern research has revealed that a number of the most common occupational hazards in railways are directly linked to cancer and other serious diseases. Federal law requires railroad employers to provide their employees with sufficient direction and protection in order to ensure their safety. If they do not and they fail to do so, they could be held liable for serious injuries that can cause death and financial ruin.
If you're a railroader or have a family member who worked for a railroad it is recommended that you seek legal advice from an experienced attorney. An attorney can determine the extent to which your exposure to carcinogens while on the job is enough to allow you to start an action. A three-year statute is in place, so you must contact an attorney as soon as you can.
In addition to asbestos railroad workers also are exposed to toxic chemicals, such as creosote, diesel fumes and exhaust. Often, these harmful fumes can cause cancer of various types, including mesothelioma, among other lung diseases. If you've been diagnosed with any of these illnesses, it is critical that you speak with a skilled railroad injury lawyer immediately.
The plaintiff was employed by the ICRC from September 1975 through December 2015. The plaintiff claims that his position at the ICRC led to him developing renal (and later adrenal) cancer. He claims that he was continuously exposed to the dangerous chemical carbon tetrachloride. This chemical is used by railroads for cleaning their tracks and brake systems.
Negligence
A lawsuit involving railroads can be brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which permits railroad workers to file complaints directly against their employers. To be qualified for damages, a worker must demonstrate that the railroad company was negligent in causing his or her injury or illness.
While working on the railway, plaintiff Greger was exposed to a variety of toxic chemicals and environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride was utilized to clean rail and brake systems. The company didn't inform him of the dangers of this chemical, which has been proven to cause cancer.
He also walked across rail ties that were coated with creosote, a substance he claimed was recognized as a danger. He also breathed diesel fumes inside locomotive cabs and claimed that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult and caused headaches. He claims to have been sickened by diesel exhaust when he stopped in tunnels while on a locomotive.
He claims that when he asked doctors about the link between his railway work kidney cancer, as well as his doctors refused to give any details. Leukemia lawsuit argues that this was negligent and that the railroad in question ought to have known about the connection between exposure to these chemicals and kidney cancer. He wants to be compensated for medical expenses in addition to pain and suffering and lost earnings.
Damages
In a lawsuit involving cancer of the railroad damages are a mixture between medical expenses, lost wages, and other expenses. The amount of these damages can vary greatly depending on the particular case. union pacific railroad lawsuit will ensure that you receive full compensation for your losses.
In one instance an older man, 51, was diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He worked as a machinist at Chicago & North Western Railway, and its successor Union Pacific Railroad, from 1976 to 2008. He was exposed to chemicals that contained benzene, including creosote, and degreasing agents.
Railroad companies are legally responsible for adhering to safety rules. This includes ensuring that workers are protected from carcinogens. If a railroad company fails to adhere to these regulations and the consequences could be devastating for the victims and their families.
Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands injured individuals and railroad workers exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us today for a free consultation with an experienced railroad injury attorney. The founder Andrew Hughes actually defended railroads in FELA cases for the majority of his legal career, so he is well-versed in the laws governing these claims as well as the risks that can arise from job exposure.